
- Image by jurvetson via Flickr
The 2000 Presidential Election was the most highly contend presidential election in recent history, if not ever. Democratic candidate Al Gore and Republican candidate George W. Bush fought a tough political battle starting on the campaign trail, moving to a recount in Florida, and finally, a Supreme Court decision. George W. Bush was granted the victory, but the results are still highly contested among political junkies.
With all the ins and outs of the 2000 Political Election, there are many questions to be answered. What could the two main candidates have done differently? What role did voter fraud or vote machine failure play in the election? And finally, what role did the Green Party play in helping Republicans win?
Nader and the Election
In 2000, Ralph Nader decided to run for President under the Green Party banner. Discouraged with the state of contemporary politics, Nader based his campaign on the individual, rallying against corporate greed and corruption. After a tough campaign, Nader and his running mate, Winona LaDuke won about 2.75 percent of the public vote. Although the Green Party came in third for the 2000 Election, they failed to garner the fiver percent necessary to qualify for federal funding in the next election.
The big story, however, was that Green Party candidates won an disproportional amount of support in New Hampshire and Florida, two states that were pivotal in the 2000 election. Media attention of this phenomena grew, and ideas started to formulate. Many people suggested that since Green Party ideals more closely align with Democrats than Republicans, the support Nader received would have shifted to Al Gore. Votes for Nader took votes away from Gore. The Green Party cost Al Gore the presidency of the United States.
However, this idea was largely discredited later. Since the election was so close, votes to any other party (Libertarians) garnered votes from the main party.






